The Sudan genocide case against UAE was dismissed by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on Monday, dealing a blow to Khartoum’s attempt to hold the Gulf nation accountable for alleged complicity in the devastating civil war that has engulfed Sudan since April 2023.
Sudan Accuses UAE of Supporting RSF Atrocities
The Sudanese government lodged the case accusing the United Arab Emirates (UAE) of materially aiding the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which stands accused of committing atrocities including mass killings, sexual violence, and forced displacement—particularly targeting the Masalit people in West Darfur.
During April hearings, Sudan’s acting Justice Minister Muawia Osman claimed that “the ongoing genocide would not be possible without UAE complicity,” alleging direct arms shipments and logistical support. Sudan asked the court to demand an end to the UAE’s support and to enforce reparations and compensation to victims.
ICJ Rules It Has No Jurisdiction
Despite the severity of the allegations, the ICJ ruled it lacked jurisdiction, citing a legal technicality: when the UAE acceded to the Genocide Convention in 2005, it entered a reservation to Article IX, which allows countries to bring disputes before the court. This reservation effectively shields the UAE from ICJ lawsuits related to genocide allegations.
In its statement, the court emphasized its deep concern over the humanitarian crisis in Sudan, stating that the conflict continues to result in immense suffering, especially in West Darfur, but clarified that the dismissal was procedural, not a judgment on the merits of Sudan’s claims.
“Whether or not states have accepted the jurisdiction of the court… they are required to comply with their obligations (to the Genocide Convention),” the court noted.
UAE Welcomes the Ruling
A UAE foreign ministry spokesperson, Reem Ketait, praised the court’s decision, calling the Sudanese case “utterly baseless” and politically motivated. She accused Khartoum of trying to divert international attention from its own alleged crimes against civilians during the two-year war.
The ICJ’s ruling does not absolve the UAE of international responsibilities, but it does mean the current legal route through the ICJ is closed to Sudan.
A Worsening Conflict in Sudan
Sudan remains locked in a brutal power struggle between army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and RSF leader Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo (Hemedti). Since the outbreak of fighting in April 2023, millions have been displaced and tens of thousands killed, with aid groups calling the situation one of the worst humanitarian and hunger crises globally.
According to a UN-backed food security assessment, famine has officially struck five areas, and in just three weeks, over 500 civilians were killed in North Darfur. On Sunday, the RSF escalated further by launching an attack on Port Sudan, previously considered a stronghold of army-aligned forces.
Protests and International Reactions
Outside the Peace Palace in The Hague, where the ICJ sits, Sudanese protesters gathered to express their dismay. Carrying signs reading “UAE kills Sudan”, demonstrators called for international justice and accountability.
“We feel completely disappointed. We only ask for justice,” said Hisham Fadl Akasha, a 57-year-old Sudanese engineer who joined the protest.
Implications for Future Legal Action
Though Sudan’s ICJ case has failed procedurally, international legal experts say other legal mechanisms could still be pursued—including UN Security Council actions, international sanctions, or domestic prosecutions in other jurisdictions.
Sudan’s allies are also expected to press for diplomatic isolation of the RSF and any state actors linked to arms transfers that sustain the conflict.
The ICJ’s decision to dismiss the Sudan genocide case against UAE highlights the limits of international law when procedural rules override substantive justice concerns. As Sudan descends deeper into violence, international pressure is mounting for tangible action to stop the killing and ensure accountability—regardless of court jurisdiction.
The ICJ ruling may have ended this particular legal battle, but the global community’s attention is now fixed on whether real justice will ever reach Sudan’s war victims.
Related: Kiir’s gamble that could slip South Sudan back to war
