The age debate in Ugandan politics has intensified because many politicians over 60 are preparing to contest in the 2026 elections. Consequently, this renewed focus on age limits stems from growing concerns about how aging affects leadership abilities.
Dr. Joel Mirembe, a medical doctor and secretary general of the Uganda Medical Association, explains that while youth brings brain growth and improved cognitive skills, aging reverses these advantages. Moreover, he says aging causes memory loss and executive dysfunction, even without disease. Furthermore, these effects worsen if disease is present.
Studies show cognitive ability declines by 30 to 40 percent between ages 80 and 89. After 90, more than half of cognitive functions deteriorate. As a result, this often leads to dementia and severe forgetfulness. Dr. Mirembe notes that about 16 percent of people aged 80 to 84 suffer from dementia. Naturally, such conditions make it hard to lead.
Physically, the brain shrinks as cells die or lose function. This, in turn, reduces memory processing and decision-making skills—both vital for political leadership.
Although the 1995 Ugandan Constitution does not set an age limit for Members of Parliament, it disqualifies people of unsound mind. Therefore, this indirectly links cognitive fitness to eligibility. This plays a key role in the ongoing age debate in Ugandan politics.
Dr. Harvey Lehman, a psychology professor at Ohio University, points out that some political leaders lack genuine leadership skills. Instead, they serve as tools for others with hidden agendas. In his report Optimum Ages for Eminent Leadership, he explains that some leaders shape followers’ thoughts. However, others simply anticipate and follow public opinion. Additionally, some politicians act as fronts for pressure groups. Hence, this raises concerns about real leadership amid the age debate.
Historically, the 1995 Constitutional Assembly debated age limits for public office. For instance, Prof. Tarsis Kabwegyere, representing Igara West County, argued for a limit of 75 instead of 60. He claimed many remain sharp at 80 or 85. This shows that the age debate in Ugandan politics is complex. Thus, age alone should not decide leadership ability.
As veteran politicians prepare for the 2026 polls, the age debate in Ugandan politics continues. It balances respect for experience with worries about mental capacity and governance. Therefore, Uganda may need clearer guidelines that reflect biology and democracy. Ultimately, understanding aging and leadership will help create a political system that values ability, vision, and inclusion.
Read: Cedric Babu Remembered as Patriot and Sports Icon
